Zum Inhalt springen
Tool Comparisons

The Right Tools for Your Business

Honest comparisons of key AI and automation tools. With prices, features and our recommendation for SMEs.

n8n vs. Make vs. Zapier: Workflow Tools Compared

n8n, Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier are the three most popular workflow automation platforms. All three connect apps and automate processes. The key difference: n8n is open source and can be self-hosted. Make offers a visual builder with strong value for money. Zapier is easiest to use but most expensive with many workflows.

Featuren8nMakeZapier
Price (10 workflows)0 EUR (self-hosted)ab 9 EUR/Monatab 49 EUR/Monat
Price (50+ workflows)0 EUR (self-hosted)ab 29 EUR/Monatab 299 EUR/Monat
Self-hosting possibleJa (Docker)NeinNein
GDPR compliant (EU servers)Ja (eigener Server)Ja (EU-Rechenzentrum)Nein (US-Server)
Number of integrations400+1.500+6.000+
Custom code nodesJa (JavaScript/Python)EingeschränktNein
AI/LLM integrationJa (Claude, OpenAI, Ollama)Ja (OpenAI, Claude)Ja (OpenAI)
Complex logic (loops, conditions)VollständigGutEingeschränkt
Learning curveMittel (2-3 Tage)Gering (1-2 Tage)Sehr gering (Stunden)
Community & supportGroße Open-Source-CommunityGuter Support, ForumGroßer Support, Doku
Suited for SMEsSehr gutGutBedingt (teuer)

Our Recommendation

For SMEs we recommend n8n. Self-hosted it costs nothing except the server (about 10 EUR/month). Data stays in the EU and flexibility is unbeatable. Make is a good alternative if the team has no technical experience. Zapier only makes sense for few, simple automations.

Claude vs. ChatGPT: Which AI Model for SMEs?

Claude (by Anthropic) and ChatGPT (by OpenAI) are the two leading AI language models. Both can generate text, analyze documents and write code. The difference lies in safety, data privacy and specializations. For SMEs, API costs and GDPR compliance are particularly important.

FeatureClaude (Anthropic)ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Text quality (long documents)Sehr gutGut
Code generationSehr gutSehr gut
Image recognition (Vision)JaJa (stärker)
Context window200K Tokens (bis 1M)128K Tokens
API costs (per 1M token input)ab 3 USD (Haiku)ab 2.50 USD (Mini)
Safety architectureConstitutional AIRLHF
GDPR complianceEU-Verarbeitung möglichUS-Verarbeitung Standard
Plugins / Tool UseTool Use APIGPTs + Plugins + Tool Use
Document analysisSehr gut (PDF, Code)Gut
SME recommendationJa (primär)Ja (ergänzend)

Our Recommendation

For enterprise applications in SMEs we recommend Claude. Output quality for long documents is higher, the safety architecture is more robust and API prices are comparable. ChatGPT has advantages in image recognition and plugins. For GDPR-critical applications, a self-hosted model (e.g. via Ollama) is the safest option.

Which tool fits your business?

We advise you for free, no strings attached. In 30 minutes find out which tech stack works best for your company.

Free Discovery Call